By replacing Dirac spin with a quaternion spin, Nature becomes local and real.  Here is a paper on the simulation.

Simulated non-local EPR correlation: CHSH = 3

https://www.dropbox.com/s/n7viaj6yio5g4mu/EPR_Sim.pdf?dl=0

(I display the link because some people cannot see the colour)

I pt links in the paper, Appendix 2, to the files and two programs, mine in FORTRAN  simf_b5.f  and the other in C converted by Pierre Leroy,    simc_b5.c

Spin with hyperhelicity,

https://www.dropbox.com/s/m1j7kaiflyz1kpy/SpinHelicity.pdf?dl=0

Deeper than Dirac

https://www.dropbox.com/s/yrqxdw84cag6z0i/DiracNB.pdf?dl=0

Quaternion spin is deeper than Dirac spanning the four dimension Dirac field of gamma matrices as one particle rather than the matter-antimatter pair DIrac proposed.

Realizing a simulation was the only way I would get my ideas accepted, I focused on that,   Over the years, I have been very grateful to have guidance from Chantal Roth.  She was particularly patient with me. She put me in contact with Pierre Leroy and he was motivational and in the course of these exchanges, he said “Only the person who knows the problem can develop the simulation.” I rolled up my sleeves and did it.

I was quite amazed how, it the end, it worked out better than I expected.  There is the problem of how Nature distinguishes polarization from coherence, but quaternion spin gives a CHSH violation of 2.995!!!  (Pierre got 3.045!!!!!!!) compared to QM with CHSH = 2.707.  The reasons for this are in the paper.  Also the determination of spin up and dn is simply the spinning of an axis R or L, as long a the axis has lined up with the field, and only one can.

The even more remarkable finding is that it looks like CHSH= 3 for Mother Nature. The reason for the 2root(2) is that QM uses entangled states and uses Dirac spin.  We are missing 10% of the correlation between EPR pairs by using QM!!  The calculation not only shows Bell’s Theorem is disproven, but also that EPR were right and QM is incomplete.

I hope you all agree and welcome comments.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *