I have asked Nature to retract the paper by Anton Zeilinger and 99 other authors:
Challenging local realism with human choices
In light of my recent discoveries, the conclusion he reaches is incorrect. I can show the opposite, and that is the violation of BI is evidence for Local Realism rather than challenging it.
It would be best if we can debate in public, and hope he agrees.
Why, Anton, is violation of Bell’s Inequalities so convincing that you accept an idea with no rational explanation? If you have a rational explanation for non-local connectivity and entanglement, please explain it, or is it simply Bell’s Theorem that you rely on?
I look forward to your reply.
